Technical standards
Standards adapted to your context and maturity level. Applicable, therefore applied.
Technical Leadership
Raise the technical bar of your Salesforce teams
Standards, reviews, mentoring, quality gates: a durable engineering framework for your internal teams and your partners. The goal is your autonomy, not our presence.
The situations we encounter
When quality rests on individuals rather than a framework, every departure becomes a risk.
Delivery quality depends on people, not on a shared framework.
Code reviews are non-existent, or purely formal.
Onboarding a new developer takes months, for lack of a structured path.
Technical decisions are made in silos, with no enterprise standard.
Dependency on a vendor or a key person threatens continuity.
Recurring regressions erode business trust in every release.
What we do
A framework calibrated for your context, installed with the team — never imposed from above.
Review process
Useful code reviews: explicit criteria, tooling, team rituals.
Coding guidelines
Concrete guidelines, illustrated with your own codebase.
Structured onboarding
An onboarding path for newcomers: documentation, environments, early wins.
Mentoring
Individual and collective support for developers and administrators, over time.
Quality gates
Objective pass criteria at each delivery stage, verifiable by every contributor.
Deliverables
A written, tooled and handed-over framework — not verbal recommendations.
- Technical standards reference
- Documented and tooled code review process
- Coding guidelines
- Onboarding path for newcomers
- Individualised mentoring plan
- Quality gates: measurable criteria per stage
How we work
Decreasing intensity by design: the framework ends up carried by the team.
Observation
The team's actual practices: strengths, gaps, day-to-day friction.
Framework
Standards, reviews and quality gates defined with the team, not against it.
Support
Mentoring, joint reviews, progressive skill building.
Autonomy
Full handover: the team owns the framework and evolves it on its own.
Typical engagements
Typical situations we address.
Insourcing a team
A CIO brings a previously fully outsourced delivery back in-house. The technical framework and mentoring secure the transition and the ramp-up.
Rapid team growth
A services group grows its Salesforce team. Standards and structured onboarding keep quality steady despite the pace of hiring.
Regaining control of quality
A public-sector organisation faces recurring regressions in production. Systematic reviews and quality gates restore trust in releases.
Frequently asked questions
What team leads ask us.
Is this coaching or delivery?
Technical leadership: we do not replace your developers, we make them progress within a structured framework. Occasionally we lead by example on real code.
Will standards slow down delivery?
The observed effect is the opposite: fewer regressions, less rework, faster reviews. Standards are calibrated for your context, not maximalist.
How do you work with our vendors?
The framework applies to all contributors, internal and external. Quality gates make expectations explicit and verifiable, which also strengthens the contractual relationship.
How long does the engagement last?
As long as it takes for the team to be autonomous. Intensity decreases by design: the mission succeeds when you no longer need us.
Does this also cover administrators?
Yes. Declarative configuration deserves the same rigour as code: conventions, reviews, documented choices. Administrators and developers share the same framework.
A team to bring up to strength?
Let's talk about its composition, its current practices and your deadlines.